Thanks Alex/Erik.

I prefer more testing than less testing, so lets go with an RC2.

I will copy over the Mac and Linux binaries into RC2 so that everything
lines up.

Thanks,
Om


On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:

> I'd make it RC2 AND ask people to re-test (i.e. invalidate previous
> votes). With a stale binary, they have been testing - and voting for -
> the wrong thing.
>
> EdB
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:31 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
> <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Weird.  I was able to reproduce the problem on my machine.  But not in my
> > IDE.  So, I recreated the binaries.  Now the problem is gone.  My best
> > guess is that I built the windows binary with a stale copy of the
> > codebase.
> >
> > Should I make a new RC2 and put up a new vote.  Or should I update RC1
> with
> > the new binaries and ask folks to re-test?
> >
> > Anyone has a preference?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Om
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 5:38 AM, piotr.zarzycki
> > <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks Maurice. Now I've got correct version osmf. :)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----
> >> Flex/Air developer open to new job offers and challenges.
> >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >>
> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Apache-Flex-SDK-Installer-2-7-Release-RC1-tp31365p31394.html
> >> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Ix Multimedia Software
>
> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> 3521 VB Utrecht
>
> T. 06-51952295
> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>

Reply via email to