Withdrawing -1. I'll vote later after I finish other checks. I decided the test wasn't written correctly. It has a tabnav with two textinputs and 3 radio buttons then a fourth radiobutton outside the tabnav. There was a RadioButtonGroup next to that fourth radiobutton that wasn't hooked up. Yes this means that other customers in this situation won't be able to tab to that fourth radiobutton, but I can't think of any reason someone would set up their UI this way in the real world. I think they'd also hook up to a separate RadioButtonGroup.
Onward! -Alex On 10/11/13 11:43 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >Weird, not obvious why this fails but the bug test cases don't. Out of >time for tonight. Will dig tomorrow. > >-Alex > >On 10/11/13 10:42 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >>-1 for now because the mustella run was not clean. Probably due to that >>FocusManager patch. I'm going to take a quick look now. >> >>-Alex >>________________________________________ >>From: Justin Mclean >>[jus...@classsoftware.com] >>Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 5:16 PM >>To: >>dev@flex.apache.org >>Subject: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.11.0 release candidate >>1 >> >>Hi, >> >>This is a Apache Flex 4.11.0 release candidate 1. Please see the >>RELEASE_NOTES and the README. >> >>There are a few new things that would be nice >>for people to test out, including: >>- New mobile datagrid >>- New 120 and 640 >>dpi skins >>- Many datagrid improvements >>- OSF 2.0 support >>- Minor ASDoc >>changes (experimental tag and examples) >> >>Please indicate when voting if you >>tested any of these features out. >> >>There is a known bug in Adobe Flash >>Builder 4.6 and 4.7 that causes a issue when creating new >>applications. >>Adobe has provided a work around for FB 4.7 but not for >>4.6. >> >>The release candidate can be found >>here; >>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.10.0/rc1/ >> >>Before >>voting please review the section,"What are the ASF requirements on >>approving >>a release?", >>at: >>http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release >> >>At a minimum >>you would be expected to check that: >>- MD5 and signed packages are correct >>- >>README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine >>- That you can >>compile from source package >>- That the SDK can be used in your IDE of >>choice >>- That the SDK can be used to make a mobile, desktop and browser >>application >> >>When testing please check the md5 and asc files and make sure >>that the source can be compiled. >> >>Please vote to approve this release: >>+1 >>Approve the release >>-1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments to >>why) >> >>This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be >>called. >> >>The vote passes if there is: >>- At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC >>- >>More positive votes than negative votes >> >>If you find an issue with the >>release that's a "show stopper" please don't hold off voting -1. If >>someone >>votes -1 please continue testing we want to try and catch as many issues >>as >>we can and cut down on the number of release candidates. Remember >>existing >>voters can change their vote during the voting process. >> >>People who are not >>in PMC are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although >>their >>votes will not be binding, they can influence how the PMC votes. >> >>When >>voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR version >>you tested the SDK with. >> >>Please put all discussion about this release in >>the DISCUSSION thread not this VOTE thread. >> >>Thanks, >>Justin >> >> >
