This is not pertaining to just this case, but our strategy in general about 'experimental' swcs. If the intention is to warn the users that these components have not been thoroughly tested, can we do that in a different way? ie. README, Release Notes, ASDocs, custom metadata, etc.?
I think it will cause a lot of headache for us and for end users when we finally make them 'non-experimental'. Thanks, Om On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Maurice Amsellem < maurice.amsel...@systar.com> wrote: > Sorry, mobile.swc is a theme, so that's different. > > Maurice > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com] > Envoyé : vendredi 27 septembre 2013 01:15 > À : dev@flex.apache.org > Objet : RE: Mobile datagrid component integration > > StyleableTextField belongs mobilecomponents.swc And MobileSkin belongs to > components.swc. > > Does this means you are going to add these two swc to the lib-path of > experimental.swc ? > > Wouldn't that make it unusable in non-mobile apps ? > > This is not an affirmation, just a question. > > Maurice > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com] Envoyé : vendredi 27 > septembre 2013 00:50 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: Mobile datagrid > component integration > > Hi, > > > It seems that MDG cannot be integrated into the experimental projects, > because it's a mobile component, and it relies on mobile-only classes ( > such as StyleableTextFiled or MobileSkin). > > Which shouldn't be too hard to fix , I can help out there. > > Thanks, > Justin >
