At some point Mike said that he was using Falcon(Jx) code for another project, secret at the time but I guess it was Randori, and that he would contribute his modifications back to Apache Flex when they had matured... Is there a way we may 'motivate' Mike to do that?
EdB On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Frédéric THOMAS <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: > IntelliJ: > > Flex Compiler Shell (fcsh) is good for small projects, and may be useful in > large projects as well, when you need to compile only some of the modules > (facets). Fcsh process is kept in memory between compilations, so it is able > to quickly recompile only changed piece of code (that is called incremental > compilation), but in case of large projects fcsh runs out of memory, then > IntelliJ IDEA restarts it automatically, but incremental compilation data is > lost. > > Mxmlc/compc processes are not kept in memory between compilations, but > simultaneous running of independent compilations gives a good performance > gain. IntelliJ IDEA automatically finds independent compilations based on > module-on-module dependencies, configured in Project Structure > (Ctrl+Alt+Shifl+S), Modules node, Dependencies tab. > > Randori: > > In Randori I track the modified files and passed them as "include-source" > parameter to the compiler to make incremental compilation, I don't what Mike > S. did behind the scene to make it work though but the source code is > opened. > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] > Envoyé : mercredi 4 septembre 2013 19:48 > À : Erik de Bruin > Cc : dev@flex.apache.org > Objet : Re: [Falcon] BasicTests compiles and runs > > > > On 9/4/13 10:43 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > >>Might we be able to get someone on the Flash Builder team (if there is >>such a thing) to join this conversation and maybe shed some light on >>some of these issues? > I believe the original authors are no longer at Adobe. > > It is interesting that folks using IntelliJ don't complain about compile > time issues yet IntelliJ doesn't use incremental compiles. It makes me > wonder whether all of that incremental compile code is truly needed or > whether there is something about Eclipse that gets in the way. > > I keep hoping someone out there has Eclipse plug-in expertise and can say > "oh yeah, here's a quick way to build a new "builder" or code model > extension. > > -Alex > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
