See the RELEASE_NOTES On 8/9/13 9:49 PM, "Tianzhen Lin" <tang...@usa.net> wrote:
>Just curious, is there a list of new/updated components in 4.10? > >Tangent > >-----Original Message----- >From: omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of OmPrakash >Muppirala >Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 11:05 PM >To: dev@flex.apache.org >Subject: Re: [Press] Nice article about Apache Flex 4.10 release > >On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Mark Kessler ><kesslerconsult...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> The badge works for me on Win7 FF22. I think if you see the link for >> it instead you need to update your flash version. I assume you run >> the debug version, those require more manual checking. >> >> -Mark >> >> > This is weird. It works for me now. Never mind - false alarm. > >Thanks, >Om > > > >> >> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:46 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala >> <bigosma...@gmail.com >> >wrote: >> >> > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Justin Mclean >> > <jus...@classsoftware.com >> > >wrote: >> > >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > > Anyone tried the installer badge here: >> flex.apache.org/installer.htmlon >> > > > Linux? I am not sure if it supports Linux. We might want to fix >> that >> > > > asap. >> > > >> > > Manage to fix it and test on windows and linux. >> > > >> > >> > Ah, dint get this email before I sent my explanation earlier. >> > >> > >> > > >> > > Can someone on windows double check - you need to make sure you >> download >> > > the new badge swf and not use a cached version. >> > > >> > >> > Tested, works fine on Chrome28 and IE 10. Firefox 22 fails the >> > flash player test and displays the get flash player link. Not sure >> > if this is >> a >> > new problem. Anyone else has this problem? >> > >> > >> > > >> > > Probably what I've done here should in theory require a vote as >> > > the >> badge >> > > could be considered deployed software, but as not fixing may cause >> > > a >> > horde >> > > of angry Linux users to descend on us I think it was the right >> > > thing to >> > do. >> > > If anyone thinks otherwise say so and I'll revert the change to >> > > the web site. >> > > >> > > What we should do next time is vote on the installer and badge at >> > > the >> > same >> > > time. >> > > >> > >> > I dont think it is really required to vote on the installer badge. >> > It is not really 'deployed software'. I agree with your quick fix >> > of the problem. We cannot afford to wait 72 hours for fixing stuff >> > broken on >> the >> > website. >> > >> > >> > > >> > > We also need some documentation of how to build the installer >> > > badge as currently there none and there no ant file or the like. >> > > >> > >> > It is just a 'release build' in the IDE. Do you think we need an >> > ant script for this? >> > >> > Thanks for fixing it so quickly! >> > >> > Om >> > >> >
