Hi, Ive fixed the build.xml to do the right thing and will check in when I can
Justin On 08/08/2013 4:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > Forget that last post, the SWFs have the right name, it is the flex-config > that isn't updated. It looks like build.number isn't set in the > build.properties. > > I think changing that should be a workaround, but we should also emphasize > to folks that the Apache Flex RSLs are not signed so they are not used > across domains, so merged-into-code is a better option unless you can > gamble that the RSLs will remain in the user's browser cache. > > -Alex > > On 8/8/13 12:48 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > >I ran the frameworks-rsls target on the source kit and it built RSLs with > >the right name. My install of RC3 also has RSLs with the right name. > > > >Maybe something just went wrong with the bin kit. > > > >-Alex > > > >On 8/8/13 10:02 AM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > > > >>Hi, > >> > >>> but actual file name in [Flex SDK]/frameworks/rsls/ is > >>>*advancedgrids_4.10.0.20130801.swf*.* > >>> *Is this done intentionally? > >>No the config file should also have 20130801 in the RSL names. > >> > >>Looks like something may of gone wrong when we moved over to using date > >>rather than SVN check in number as part of the GIt move. > >> > >>Thanks, > >>Justin > > > >
