+1 -- Jose Barragan Chief Software Architect Codeoscopic Madrid C/. Infanta Mercedes, 92. Planta 5. 505. 28020 Madrid. Tel.: +34 912 94 80 80
On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:09 PM, "aYo ~" <a...@binitie.com> wrote: > +1 - I defer to Alex's suggetions > > ~a~ > www.ayobinitie.com > http://mrbinitie.blogspot.com > > > On 2 June 2013 10:06, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 Binding >> >> Thanks, >> Om >> >> On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 3:02 AM, João Fernandes >> <joaopedromartinsfernan...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> +1 (non binding) >>> >>> To me, all those points were already clear in the previous thread. >>> >>> >>> On 2 June 2013 10:57, Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (non binding) >>>> >>>> >>>> 2013/6/2 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> >>>> >>>>> This vote comes from an original vote thread declared as null (see >>>>> original thread for info about motivations): >>>>> >>>>> http://markmail.org/message/o6zjmorfh4lxuygo >>>>> >>>>> The new vote thread is considering the donation of the optional >> MVC/IOC >>>>> Swiz Framework. >>>>> >>>>> Points taken from the original vote thread: >>>>> >>>>> * Swiz is a great addition to Apache Flex since it complements de SDK >>>> with >>>>> a microarquitecture for application MVC, IOC, DI very simple and well >>>>> designed. * This will be a project like flexunit or utilities. So it's >>>>> optional a NOT part of the main sdk. * Swiz is already in 1.4.0 stable >>>>> version, under Apache License 2.0, has its community and right now >>>> there's >>>>> no maintenance or upgrade since people behind the project is no longer >>>>> working with Flex technology. * Donation will be 1.4.0 source code and >>>> wiki >>>>> content. * Future plans: if donation is successful, Chris Scott >> (creator >>>> of >>>>> Swiz) will want to donate experimental 2.0.0 branch that brings AOP >>>>> support, a feature that could bring a great benefit to Apache Flex >> since >>>> it >>>>> brings something very new to client web technologies and that will >>>> require >>>>> evolution at compiler level (introducing compile time weaving). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Here's the new points from Alex Harui to make clear what it implies: >>>>> >>>>> 1) Swiz goes in its own repo. The original proposal says it could go >>>> into >>>>> a folder under utilities, but I think flexunit is a better model. >>>>> 2) Swiz will have active development but release separately from the >> SDK. >>>>> The activity level isn't quite clear from the original proposal. >> People >>>>> need to be comfortable that this activity isn't an endorsement or >>>>> favoritism. >>>>> 3) Acceptance of Swiz is not an endorsement or favoritism. >>>>> 4) Any other app framework is welcomed to be donated via the same >>>> process. >>>>> >>>>> This vote thread will be open for the next 72 hours >>>>> >>>>> Please make your vote. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> João Fernandes >>
