+1 Binding Thanks, Om
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 3:02 AM, João Fernandes <joaopedromartinsfernan...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > To me, all those points were already clear in the previous thread. > > > On 2 June 2013 10:57, Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote: > >> +1 (non binding) >> >> >> 2013/6/2 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> >> >> > This vote comes from an original vote thread declared as null (see >> > original thread for info about motivations): >> > >> > http://markmail.org/message/o6zjmorfh4lxuygo >> > >> > The new vote thread is considering the donation of the optional MVC/IOC >> > Swiz Framework. >> > >> > Points taken from the original vote thread: >> > >> > * Swiz is a great addition to Apache Flex since it complements de SDK >> with >> > a microarquitecture for application MVC, IOC, DI very simple and well >> > designed. * This will be a project like flexunit or utilities. So it's >> > optional a NOT part of the main sdk. * Swiz is already in 1.4.0 stable >> > version, under Apache License 2.0, has its community and right now >> there's >> > no maintenance or upgrade since people behind the project is no longer >> > working with Flex technology. * Donation will be 1.4.0 source code and >> wiki >> > content. * Future plans: if donation is successful, Chris Scott (creator >> of >> > Swiz) will want to donate experimental 2.0.0 branch that brings AOP >> > support, a feature that could bring a great benefit to Apache Flex since >> it >> > brings something very new to client web technologies and that will >> require >> > evolution at compiler level (introducing compile time weaving). >> > >> > >> > Here's the new points from Alex Harui to make clear what it implies: >> > >> > 1) Swiz goes in its own repo. The original proposal says it could go >> into >> > a folder under utilities, but I think flexunit is a better model. >> > 2) Swiz will have active development but release separately from the SDK. >> > The activity level isn't quite clear from the original proposal. People >> > need to be comfortable that this activity isn't an endorsement or >> > favoritism. >> > 3) Acceptance of Swiz is not an endorsement or favoritism. >> > 4) Any other app framework is welcomed to be donated via the same >> process. >> > >> > This vote thread will be open for the next 72 hours >> > >> > Please make your vote. >> > >> > >> > > > > -- > > João Fernandes
