Here is the actual output for that issue: [asdoc] /Users/erik/Documents/ApacheFlex/git/flex-sdk/frameworks/projects/airspark/src/spark/components/WindowedApplication.as: Error: Can not resolve a multiname reference unambiguously. spark.components:Alert (from /Users/erik/Documents/ApacheFlex/git/flex-sdk/frameworks/projects/experimental/src/spark/components/Alert.as) and mx.controls:Alert (from /Users/erik/Documents/ApacheFlex/git/flex-sdk/frameworks/projects/mx/src/mx/controls/Alert.as) are available.
I can fix this by prefixing the only call to Alert in WindowedApplication.as (on line 1939) with 'mx.controls. EdB On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 5/21/13 9:55 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > >>>> >>>>2) the build fails because it sees 2 versions of the Alert class (in >>>>experimental and in MX): prefixing the only call to Alert on line 1939 >>>>of airspark::spark.components.WindowedApplication with 'mx.controls.' >>>>seems to fix this. Does that make sense and should I commit that >>>>change? >>> I suppose, but doesn't this mean that lots of other folks will have this >>> problem? Can we/should we change the name of the class in experimental? >> >>I wasn't seeing this in my code, it popped up while building the asdoc >>target of the SDK ant build.xml. If you like, I can reproduce the >>error and get you the actual error text? > That would be great, or I'll try to find time later. Smells like a > compiler issue, but hopefully only for apps that try to use both Alerts, > which should be rare. > > -Alex > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
