On 5/21/13 3:41 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>When working through the release procedure I noticed some issues with
>the ASDoc build:
>
>1) the build complains there is a property 'tlf.branch' that is not
>set; setting this property to '${basedir}/../flex-tlf/textLayout' in
>'build.properties' seems to fix this. Shouldn't this be a default
>setting (the property is presently commented out)?
Actually, I wanted to get rid of tlf.branch. I thought I'd replaced them
all with TLF_HOME. I can take a look if you don't have cycles.
>
>2) the build fails because it sees 2 versions of the Alert class (in
>experimental and in MX): prefixing the only call to Alert on line 1939
>of airspark::spark.components.WindowedApplication with 'mx.controls.'
>seems to fix this. Does that make sense and should I commit that
>change?
I suppose, but doesn't this mean that lots of other folks will have this
problem? Can we/should we change the name of the class in experimental?
>
>3) the build complains about unclosed tags in
>experimental::spark.layouts.CoverflowLayout.as and RolodexLayout.
>Tweaking the markup a bit and rebuilding the SDK makes these go away.
>
>4) the 'asdoc-output' directory is not cleaned up after a run, nor is
>it included in .gitignore. Which one is preferable?
I would choose .gitignore so you can examine the results if the run
succeeds but doesn't quite do what you want.
>
>Running 'ant release' again, hoping to make it succeed...
Thanks for working on this.
>
>EdB
>
>
>
>--
>Ix Multimedia Software
>
>Jan Luykenstraat 27
>3521 VB Utrecht
>
>T. 06-51952295
>I. www.ixsoftware.nl
