Hi, A little out of the loop here but have been following.
> Alex, personally, I dont mind the additional 6K. I would rather take IE6&7 > support in return for it. From what I understand there are other benefits other than just IE6+7 support right? IE7 support may be important to our existing user base ie enterprise? > But I agree that we need to keep the file size to a minimum as much as > possible. I agree but given that a single image can be more than 6K, and the JS is most likely cached (on 2+ visit and ever better if we can host in a central location) is that 6K really such a technical issue? If the extra 6k saves me having to debug a single client issue or saves me any time coding it's worth it IMO. Perhaps there's another way - it there a way to make it optional? Thanks, Justin
