I knew I looked at what you did before.
I see no problem with that Erik, if you test visitAcessor() and it
does what you want and in the context of the method which is to test
the production of a unit where the unit here is a field and
Object.defineProperty() so that is good.
Does my thinking about state make sense to you with this example? We
are trying to avoid crossed wires.
Mike
Quoting Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl>:
Hi,
I'm aware we're trying to keep a state-less thing going with FJx, but
I ran into an issue that I'm not sure how to solve without adding some
kind of storage (private variable) on the 'goog' emitter.
The thing is that a property has/can have both a getter and a setter
accessor. For a full 'goog' implementation, in addition to emitting
'Object.defineProperty' for each, we also want to add a property
declaration on the prototype, to set the type. We want to add this
declaration only once, so my solution is to 'remember' if I already
added it in a private variable, since I know of no other way of
checking if I have already written something to the output.
Am I doing it right?
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
--
Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
http://www.teotigraphix.com
http://blog.teotigraphix.com
