Hi Shahaf,
Well, the application could.
While we can't ignore the advantages of enabling the offloads.
I felt if we should really mandate applications to request all the
supported offloads?
Thanks
Ajit
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>
wrote:
> On 3/6/2018 7:40 PM, Ajit Khaparde wrote:
> > Update bnxt PMD to new ethdev offloads API.
> > Signed-off-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> ------------
> > 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_
> ethdev.c
> > index 21c46f833..cca4ef40c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
> > @@ -146,6 +146,27 @@ static const struct rte_pci_id bnxt_pci_id_map[] = {
> > ETH_RSS_NONFRAG_IPV6_TCP | \
> > ETH_RSS_NONFRAG_IPV6_UDP)
> >
> > +#define BNXT_DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_SUPPORT (DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_INSERT | \
> > + DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM | \
> > + DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM | \
> > + DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM | \
> > + DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_TSO | \
> > + DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_OUTER_IPV4_CKSUM | \
> > + DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_VXLAN_TNL_TSO | \
> > + DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_GRE_TNL_TSO | \
> > + DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_IPIP_TNL_TSO | \
> > + DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_GENEVE_TNL_TSO | \
> > + DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MULTI_SEGS)
> > +
> > +#define BNXT_DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_SUPPORT (DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_FILTER | \
> > + DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_STRIP | \
> > + DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM | \
> > + DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM | \
> > + DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM | \
> > + DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_OUTER_IPV4_CKSUM | \
> > + DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_JUMBO_FRAME | \
> > + DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP)
> > +
> > static int bnxt_vlan_offload_set_op(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, int mask);
> > static void bnxt_print_link_info(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev);
> >
> > @@ -430,21 +451,14 @@ static void bnxt_dev_info_get_op(struct
> rte_eth_dev *eth_dev,
> > dev_info->min_rx_bufsize = 1;
> > dev_info->max_rx_pktlen = BNXT_MAX_MTU + ETHER_HDR_LEN +
> ETHER_CRC_LEN
> > + VLAN_TAG_SIZE;
> > - dev_info->rx_offload_capa = DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_STRIP |
> > - DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM |
> > - DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM |
> > - DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM |
> > - DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_OUTER_IPV4_CKSUM;
> > - dev_info->tx_offload_capa = DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_INSERT |
> > - DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM |
> > - DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM |
> > - DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM |
> > - DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_TSO |
> > - DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_OUTER_IPV4_CKSUM |
> > - DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_VXLAN_TNL_TSO |
> > - DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_GRE_TNL_TSO |
> > - DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_IPIP_TNL_TSO |
> > - DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_GENEVE_TNL_TSO;
> > +
> > + dev_info->rx_queue_offload_capa = BNXT_DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_SUPPORT;
>
> Hi Ajit,
>
> Is bnxt supports queue level offloads? If not PMD should return 0 as
> rx_queue_offload_capa and tx_queue_offload_capa.
>
> > + dev_info->rx_offload_capa = BNXT_DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_SUPPORT;
> > + if (bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_PTP_SUPPORTED)
> > + dev_info->rx_offload_capa |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TIMESTAMP;
> > + dev_info->tx_queue_offload_capa = BNXT_DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_SUPPORT;
> > + dev_info->tx_offload_capa = BNXT_DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_SUPPORT;
> > + dev_info->flow_type_rss_offloads = BNXT_ETH_RSS_SUPPORT;
> >
> > /* *INDENT-OFF* */
> > dev_info->default_rxconf = (struct rte_eth_rxconf) {
> > @@ -454,7 +468,8 @@ static void bnxt_dev_info_get_op(struct rte_eth_dev
> *eth_dev,
> > .wthresh = 0,
> > },
> > .rx_free_thresh = 32,
> > - .rx_drop_en = 0,
> > + /* If no descriptors available, pkts are dropped by
> default */
> > + .rx_drop_en = 1,
> > };
> >
> > dev_info->default_txconf = (struct rte_eth_txconf) {
> > @@ -465,8 +480,6 @@ static void bnxt_dev_info_get_op(struct rte_eth_dev
> *eth_dev,
> > },
> > .tx_free_thresh = 32,
> > .tx_rs_thresh = 32,
> > - .txq_flags = ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOMULTSEGS |
> > - ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOOFFLOADS,
> > };
> > eth_dev->data->dev_conf.intr_conf.lsc = 1;
> >
> > @@ -510,6 +523,16 @@ static void bnxt_dev_info_get_op(struct rte_eth_dev
> *eth_dev,
> > static int bnxt_dev_configure_op(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev)
> > {
> > struct bnxt *bp = (struct bnxt *)eth_dev->data->dev_private;
> > + uint64_t tx_offloads = eth_dev->data->dev_conf.txmode.offloads;
> > + uint64_t rx_offloads = eth_dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads;
> > +
> > + if (tx_offloads != BNXT_DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_SUPPORT)
> > + PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Tx offloads requested 0x%lx supported
> 0x%x\n",
> > + tx_offloads, BNXT_DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_SUPPORT);
>
> Isn't is possible that application request only a subset of the supported
> offloads?
>
> And should API return an error for this case?
>
> > +
> > + if (rx_offloads != BNXT_DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_SUPPORT)
> > + PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Rx offloads requested 0x%lx supported
> 0x%x\n",
> > + rx_offloads, BNXT_DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_SUPPORT);
> >
> > bp->rx_queues = (void *)eth_dev->data->rx_queues;
> > bp->tx_queues = (void *)eth_dev->data->tx_queues;
> >
>
>
