On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:51:57PM +0000, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 1/13/2016 4:49 PM, stephen at networkplumber.org (Stephen Hemminger) wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 15:07:08 +0000
> > Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson at intel.com> wrote:
> >
> >> So, while the two-tab indent may look "a bit weird" it does solve the two
> >> issues
> >> above. I believe practical benefits should override initial impressions.
> >> [It took
> >> me a while to get used to also, but now I very much like it as a style.]
> >
> > I don't think that deviating from kernel style for this case is justified.
>
> This is very old patch still sitting in patchwork, re-visiting it mainly to be
> able to clean the patchwork.
Just drop it, there is no reason to revisit it.
--yliu
>
> This is a syntax change request and although I have my personal preferences I
> would be OK with whatever decided.
>
> Currently there is already a decided syntax, changing it after this point will
> cause either mixed usage or a big syntax cleanup patch. I think both are not
> good.
>
> I am for continue whatever documented in current DPDK coding style doc, hence
> NAK from my side.
>
> Thanks,
> ferruh
