> From: Pavan Nikhilesh [mailto:pbhagavat...@caviumnetworks.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 3:02 PM
> To: jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com; santosh.shu...@caviumnetworks.com;
> Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richard...@intel.com>; Van Haaren, Harry
> <harry.van.haa...@intel.com>; Eads, Gage <gage.e...@intel.com>;
> hemant.agra...@nxp.com; nipun.gu...@nxp.com; Ma, Liang J
> <liang.j...@intel.com>
[Side note: we shouldn't put everybody on CC all the time..]
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavat...@caviumnetworks.com>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 10/11] test: register eventdev selftest
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavat...@caviumnetworks.com>
> diff --git a/test/test/test_eventdev.c b/test/test/test_eventdev.c
> index 1ed2a1ddd..b86efab01 100644
> --- a/test/test/test_eventdev.c
> +++ b/test/test/test_eventdev.c
> @@ -1009,4 +1009,11 @@ test_eventdev_common(void)
> return unit_test_suite_runner(&eventdev_common_testsuite);
> }
>
> +static int
> +test_eventdev_selftest(void)
> +{
> + return rte_event_dev_selftest(TEST_DEV_ID);
> +}
> +
> REGISTER_TEST_COMMAND(eventdev_common_autotest, test_eventdev_common);
> +REGISTER_TEST_COMMAND(eventdev_selftest, test_eventdev_selftest);
Currently when running the test app, we don't pass any arguments. Running the
"eventdev_sw_autotest" command, it will create the required event_sw0 PMD vdev,
and launch the tests then.
Given the selftest is PMD agnostic, does it makes sense to have a single string
"sw" or "octeontx" to run the tests against? Right now it requires that we pass
./app/test --vdev event_sw0 which I think is a burden, particularly when
automating this with the meson test infrastructure down the line.
Summary; Please add a string parameter that indicates the PMD to run the
self-test on.
