On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 09:23:41PM +0100, Adrien Mazarguil wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 10:34:12AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 17:46:23 +0100
> > Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarg...@6wind.com> wrote:
> >
<snip>
> > > +static int
> > > +hyperv_iface_is_netvsc(const struct if_nameindex *iface)
> > > +{
> > > + static const char temp[] = "/sys/class/net/%s/device/class_id";
> > > + char path[snprintf(NULL, 0, temp, iface->if_name) + 1];
> >
> > Doing this snprintf is gross. Either use PATH_MAX or asprintf
>
> I don't think allocating more stack space than necessary or on the heap with
> a possible allocation failure to deal with is any better, sorry.
>
> Prove this snprintf() call can fail and you'll have a point.
>
While I get your point, I'd tend to go with Stephen's view on this that
it's looking a bit "gross". What's the problem with allocating a bit
more stack space for it?
/Bruce
