Hello all,

My question is about neighbor packet matching algorithm for TCP. Is it
correct to expect that IP packets should have continuous ID enumeration
(i.e. iph-next.id = iph-prev.id + 1)?

~~~
lib/librte_gro/gro_tcp4.c:check_seq_option()
        ...
        /* check if the two packets are neighbors */
        tcp_dl0 = pkt0->pkt_len - pkt0->l2_len - pkt0->l3_len - tcp_hl0;
        if ((sent_seq == (item->sent_seq + tcp_dl0)) &&
                        (ip_id == (item->ip_id + 1)))
                /* append the new packet */
                return 1;
        else if (((sent_seq + tcp_dl) == item->sent_seq) &&
                        ((ip_id + item->nb_merged) == item->ip_id))
                /* pre-pend the new packet */
                return -1;
        else
                return 0;
~~~

As per RFC791:

  Identification:  16 bits

    An identifying value assigned by the sender to aid in assembling the
    fragments of a datagram.

Reply via email to