-----Original Message-----
> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 22:47:20 +0100
> From: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/x86: get hypervisor name
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.15.0
>
> The CPUID instruction is catched by hypervisor which can return
> a flag indicating one is running, and its name.
>
> Suggested-by: Stephen Hemminger <sthem...@microsoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>
> ---
> warning: to be tested
> ---
> lib/librte_eal/common/arch/arm/rte_cpuflags.c | 6 +++++
> lib/librte_eal/common/arch/ppc_64/rte_cpuflags.c | 6 +++++
> lib/librte_eal/common/arch/x86/rte_cpuflags.c | 30
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
> .../common/include/arch/x86/rte_cpuflags.h | 1 +
> .../common/include/generic/rte_cpuflags.h | 14 ++++++++++
> lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map | 9 ++++++-
> 6 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> RTE_CPUFLAG_FPU, /**< FPU */
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/generic/rte_cpuflags.h
> b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/generic/rte_cpuflags.h
> index c1c5551fc..3832fb851 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/generic/rte_cpuflags.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/generic/rte_cpuflags.h
> @@ -93,4 +93,18 @@ rte_cpu_check_supported(void);
> int
> rte_cpu_is_supported(void);
>
> +enum rte_hypervisor {
> + RTE_HYPERVISOR_NONE,
> + RTE_HYPERVISOR_KVM,
> + RTE_HYPERVISOR_HYPERV,
> + RTE_HYPERVISOR_VMWARE,
> + RTE_HYPERVISOR_UNKNOWN
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * Get the type of hypervisor it is running on.
> + */
> +enum rte_hypervisor
> +rte_hypervisor_get_name(void);
Cc: chao...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
IMO, cpu_flag area is the not the correct abstraction to get
the hypervisor name. It is x86 specific. I think, correct
usage will be to call hypervisor specific APIs like KVM_GET_API_VERSION
https://lwn.net/Articles/658511/
BTW, What is the need for an DPDK application to know the
hypervisor name? What action an DPDK application should
take based on hypervisor name? if is not interest of data plane
application why it needs to be abstracted in DPDK?
