Hi Akhil,
>
> Hi Konstantin,
>
> On 10/19/2017 2:53 PM, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Akhil Goyal [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2017 11:17 PM
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Cc: Doherty, Declan <[email protected]>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> >> <[email protected]>;
> [email protected];
> >> Nicolau, Radu <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> >> [email protected]; [email protected];
> >> [email protected]; [email protected]; Mcnamara, John
> >> <[email protected]>; Ananyev, Konstantin
> >> <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> >> [email protected]
> >> Subject: [PATCH v4 06/12] ethdev: support security APIs
> >>
> >> From: Declan Doherty <[email protected]>
> >>
> >> rte_flow_action type and ethdev updated to support rte_security
> >> sessions for crypto offload to ethernet device.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Boris Pismenny <[email protected]>
> >> Signed-off-by: Aviad Yehezkel <[email protected]>
> >> Signed-off-by: Radu Nicolau <[email protected]>
> >> Signed-off-by: Declan Doherty <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >> lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c | 11 +++++++++++
> >> lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> >> lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev_version.map | 1 +
> >> 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> >> index 0b1e928..9520f1e 100644
> >> --- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> >> +++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> >> @@ -301,6 +301,17 @@ rte_eth_dev_socket_id(uint16_t port_id)
> >> return rte_eth_devices[port_id].data->numa_node;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +void *
> >> +rte_eth_dev_get_sec_ctx(uint8_t port_id)
> >> +{
> >> + RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, NULL);
> >> +
> >> + if (rte_eth_devices[port_id].data->dev_flags & RTE_ETH_DEV_SECURITY)
> >
> >
> > As you don't currently support MP, it is probably worth to add somewhere
> > (here or at PMD layer) check for process type.
> > Something like:
> > if (rte_eal_process_type() != RTE_PROC_PRIMARY)
> > return NULL;
> > or so.
> > Konstantin
> >
> >
> The MP issue is resolved as per my understanding in the v4.
As I can see from v4 - MP is still not supported:
1. security_ctx is placed into rte_eth_dev_data (which is shared between
multiple processes)
while it still contains a pointer to particular ops functions.
To support MP you'll probably need to split security_ctx into 2 parts:
private to process (ops) and shared between processes (actual data),
or comeup with some other (smarter) way.
2. At least ixgbe_dev_init() right now always blindly allocates new
security_ctx and overwrites eth_dev->data->security_ctx with this new
value.
I do remember that for you didn't plan to support MP for 17.11 anyway.
So I suggest for now just to make sure that secondary process wouldn't touch
that shared security_ctx in any way.
The easiest thing would probably be to move it from shared to private part of
ethdev:
i.e. move void *security_ctx; from struct rte_eth_dev_data to struct rte_eth_dev
(you'll probably have to do it anyway later, because of #1)
and make sure it is initialized only for primary process.
Konstantin
> SO I believe this check is not required anymore. Do you see any issue in MP.
>
> -Akhil
