Hi Konstantin,
On 10/19/2017 2:53 PM, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
Hi guys,
-----Original Message-----
From: Akhil Goyal [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2017 11:17 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Doherty, Declan <[email protected]>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
<[email protected]>; [email protected];
Nicolau, Radu <[email protected]>; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; Mcnamara, John
<[email protected]>; Ananyev, Konstantin
<[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH v4 06/12] ethdev: support security APIs
From: Declan Doherty <[email protected]>
rte_flow_action type and ethdev updated to support rte_security
sessions for crypto offload to ethernet device.
Signed-off-by: Boris Pismenny <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Aviad Yehezkel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Radu Nicolau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Declan Doherty <[email protected]>
---
lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c | 11 +++++++++++
lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev_version.map | 1 +
3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
index 0b1e928..9520f1e 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
+++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
@@ -301,6 +301,17 @@ rte_eth_dev_socket_id(uint16_t port_id)
return rte_eth_devices[port_id].data->numa_node;
}
+void *
+rte_eth_dev_get_sec_ctx(uint8_t port_id)
+{
+ RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, NULL);
+
+ if (rte_eth_devices[port_id].data->dev_flags & RTE_ETH_DEV_SECURITY)
As you don't currently support MP, it is probably worth to add somewhere
(here or at PMD layer) check for process type.
Something like:
if (rte_eal_process_type() != RTE_PROC_PRIMARY)
return NULL;
or so.
Konstantin
The MP issue is resolved as per my understanding in the v4.
SO I believe this check is not required anymore. Do you see any issue in MP.
-Akhil
