22/10/2017 22:37, Akhil Goyal: > Hi All, > On 10/21/2017 9:43 PM, Akhil Goyal wrote: > > Hi Thomas, > > On 10/20/2017 3:02 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > >> 16/10/2017 12:44, Thomas Monjalon: > >>> 15/10/2017 00:17, Akhil Goyal: > >>>> This patchset introduce the rte_security library in DPDK. > >>>> This also includes the sample implementation of drivers and > >>>> changes in ipsec gateway application to demonstrate its usage. > >>> [...] > >>>> This patchset is also available at: > >>>> git://dpdk.org/draft/dpdk-draft-ipsec > >>>> branch: integration_v4 > >>> > >>> If I understand well, this patchset is the result of the group work? > >>> Nothing else is needed to merge for the IPsec offload features? > > Yes this patchset is a result of a group work. > > We do not need anything else to be merged for ipsec offload features. > > But Aviad has made some fixes in the ipsec application which may result > > in conflict with the last patch in this series. > > So v4 was just rebased over those patches sent by Aviad separately. > > We would send a v5 incorporating/answering to all the comments/queries > > rebased over the v2 of the Aviad's fixes to the application. > > > > Just for information, > I have rebased the rte_security patches over crypto-next and over > Aviad's v2. The patches are available at the draft tree > "git://dpdk.org/draft/dpdk-draft-ipsec", branch integration_v5. > > The patchset include the changes suggested by Thomas and Konstantin on v4. > > The patches are not sent to the mailing list as the ipsec-secgw patches > from Aviad needs a v3 and I would like to send the patch set rebased > over the v3. I will send the patchset as soon as Aviad's patches are > ready to be merged(most probably on Monday). > > Please let me know in case, there is some risk in getting this series > applied in RC2.
Thanks for the info Akhil. A lot of other things are not yet ready for RC2. You are still in time.
