On Wednesday 11 October 2017 04:12 PM, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:


On 10/11/2017 2:54 PM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
Hello Jianfeng,

On Monday 09 October 2017 04:57 PM, Jianfeng Tan wrote:

[...]
-#define PMD_DRV_LOG(level, fmt, args...) \
-    PMD_DRV_LOG_RAW(level, fmt "\n", ## args)
+#define FSLMC_VFIO_LOG(level, fmt, args...) \
+    RTE_LOG(level, EAL, "%s(): " fmt "\n", __func__, ##args)

This change breaks the FSLMC bus driver. There are macros like PMD_DRV_LOG which are still in use in the code.
Before removing the above, those would have to be restructured.

Just try to change all PMD_DRV_LOG in fslmc to FSLMC_VFIO_LOG. As you are working on that, I will drop it. >

I am already working on converting this logging into dynamic logging.
Can you skip this work until then? Does it block your work?

Do you mean you are working on introducing a new log type for bus drivers?

A dynamic log type using rte_log_register. So, "bus.fslmc", "net.dpaa2" and so on. I am not introducing LOGTYPE_BUS.

In past [1], I sent a patch for LOGTYPE_BUS but at that time I understood that dynamic logging is the preferred way.

[1] http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/24478/



Thanks,
Jianfeng


Reply via email to