> -----Original Message----- > From: Ferruh Yigit [mailto:ferruh.yi...@intel.com] > Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 12:07 PM > To: Shachar Beiser <shacha...@mellanox.com>; dev@dpdk.org > Cc: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarg...@6wind.com>; Nélio Laranjeiro > <nelio.laranje...@6wind.com> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] net/mlx5: support upstream rdma-core > > On 9/17/2017 8:31 AM, Shachar Beiser wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Ferruh Yigit [mailto:ferruh.yi...@intel.com] > >> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 4:47 PM > >> To: Shachar Beiser <shacha...@mellanox.com>; dev@dpdk.org > >> Cc: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarg...@6wind.com>; Nélio Laranjeiro > >> <nelio.laranje...@6wind.com> > >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] net/mlx5: support upstream > >> rdma-core > >> > >> On 9/14/2017 2:34 PM, Shachar Beiser wrote: > >>> This removes the dependency on specific Mellanox OFED libraries by > >>> using the upstream rdma-core and linux upstream community code. > >> > >> Would you mind mentioning what is the difference between "specific > >> Mellanox OFED libraries" and "upstream rdma-core"? If not in the > >> documentation, at least in mail list for interested people? > >> > >> Does it make sense to put this update into release notes? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> ferruh > >> > > > > Hi Ferruh, > > > > Both packages, rdma-core upstream & Mellanox OFED are Linux user- > space packages : > > 1. Rdma-core is the Linux upstream user-space package. > > 2. Mellanox OFED is the Mellanox's Linux user-space package. > > The difference is the APIs . We shall explain that difference in the > > release notes . > > The difference can be too much detail for release notes, I believe it is good > to > mention in release notes the dependency requirement change, as above > commit log. > > But this commit log can have the detail. I will send a new PATCHv6 with an updated commit log . That contains this explanation above. The release notes will updated by Shahaf Shuler separately.
> > > > > -Shachar Beiser. > > > >>> > >>> --- > >>> I have squashed : > >>> [PATCH v2 3/3] “net/mlx5: fix interrupt enable return” > >>> > >> > https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdpd > >> k > >>> > >> > .org%2Fdev%2Fpatchwork%2Fpatch%2F28380%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cshach > >> arbe%40m > >>> > >> > ellanox.com%7Cc79d7690cb454f8dd41508d4fb771dea%7Ca652971c7d2e4d9b > >> a6a4d > >>> > >> > 149256f461b%7C0%7C0%7C636409936407431479&sdata=T5wgSUeCx1tzM9Z > >> UnBAauNt > >>> iG4djfIpOJZOj%2FWM6v4Y%3D&reserved=0 > >>> into this patch > >>> > >>> a. Compile with rdma-core commit f11292efd541 ("Merge pull request > >>> #202") b. Tested with linux kernel 4.13-rc4 c. For performance > >>> testing recommended to wait till kernel 4.14 > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Shachar Beiser <shacha...@mellanox.com> > >> > >> <...> > >
