Monday, September 11, 2017 9:21 AM, Jerin Jacob: > > I don't think that is in following this series. It should be in this series, > if we are > removing a feature then we should find a way to fit that in some location as > there is a use case for it[1]. Without an alternative, this patch is NACK from > me. > > [1] > https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdpd > k.org%2Fml%2Farchives%2Fdev%2F2017- > September%2F074475.html&data=02%7C01%7Cshahafs%40mellanox.com%7 > C6ce00422e1db4075f9f808d4f8dd5f39%7Ca652971c7d2e4d9ba6a4d149256f46 > 1b%7C0%7C0%7C636407077062635613&sdata=INJMOfiL9iwSboWuTVhnVvllu > e2gS1%2FVB4Aj9XP09No%3D&reserved=0
I don't understand. >From the exact link above, you explicitly say that *you* will move this flags >once the series is integrated. Quoting: " > Please Jerin, could you work on moving these settings in a new API? Sure. Once the generic code is in place. We are committed to fix the PMDs by 18.02. " What has changed?
