> -----Original Message-----
> From: 王志克 [mailto:wangzh...@jd.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2017 2:03 PM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng; us...@dpdk.org; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: long initialization of rte_eal_hugepage_init
>
> Do you mean "pagesize" when you say "size" option? I have specified the
> pagesize as 1G.
No, I mean "size". I mean adding another hugetlbfs with total size = what you
need for your app. And with another DPDK option "--huge-dir", we can avoid
allocating all free hugepages.
If you want to allocate memory on different sockets, e.g., --socket-mem
1024,1024, you need a newer DPDK with below commit by Ilya Maximets:
commit 1b72605d241 ("mem: balanced allocation of hugepages").
Thanks,
Jianfeng
> Also, I already use "--socket-mem " to specify that the application only needs
> 1G per NUMA node.
>
> The problem is that map_all_hugepages() would map all free huge pages,
> and then select the proper ones. If I have 500 free huge pages (each 1G), and
> application only needs 1G per NUMA socket, it is unreasonable for such
> mapping.
>
> My use case is OVS+DPDK. The OVS+DPDK would only need 2G, and other
> application (Qemu/VM) would use the other huge pages.
>
> Br,
> Wang Zhike
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tan, Jianfeng [mailto:jianfeng....@intel.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2017 12:36 PM
> To: 王志克; us...@dpdk.org; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: long initialization of rte_eal_hugepage_init
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: users [mailto:users-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of ???
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2017 11:25 AM
> > To: us...@dpdk.org; dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: [dpdk-users] long initialization of rte_eal_hugepage_init
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I observed that rte_eal_hugepage_init() will take quite long time if there
> are
> > lots of huge pages. Example I have 500 1G huge pages, and it takes about 2
> > minutes. That is too long especially for application restart case.
> >
> > If the application only needs limited huge page while the host have lots of
> > huge pages, the algorithm is not so efficent. Example, we only need 1G
> > memory from each socket.
> >
> > What is the proposal from DPDK community? Any solution?
>
> You can mount hugetlbfs with "size" option + use "--socket-mem" option in
> DPDK to restrict the memory to be used.
>
> Thanks,
> Jianfeng
>
> >
> > Note I tried version dpdk 16.11.
> >
> > Br,
> > Wang Zhike
