> From: Guduri Prathyusha [mailto:gprathyu...@caviumnetworks.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2017 3:11 PM
> To: Van Haaren, Harry <harry.van.haa...@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Guduri Prathyusha <gprathyu...@caviumnetworks.com>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] service: fix service lcore stop function
>
> lcore_states store the state of the lcore. Fixing the invalid
> dereference of lcore_states with service number
>
> Fixes: 21698354c832 ("service: introduce service cores concept")
>
> Signed-off-by: Guduri Prathyusha <gprathyu...@caviumnetworks.com>
Hi Guduri,
This looks like a genuine bug-fix - thanks for looking into it and providing a
patch. Typically, DPDK tries to fix the unit-tests and a bug at the same time -
this ensures that the unit tests continue to pass at every test. So, patch 2/2
of this series can be merged into this patch, and include both Fixes: lines.
Secondly, does this patchset apply to the current dpdk (17.08), or to the
future service-cores patches? If it doesn't apply cleanly on the future
patches, it is probably better to A) include it in that patchset, or B) rebase
this fix patch onto the service cores patches.
Hope that makes sense, and let me know if you'd prefer A) or B) above. Thanks,
-Harry
> ---
> lib/librte_eal/common/rte_service.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/rte_service.c
> b/lib/librte_eal/common/rte_service.c
> index 7efb76dc8..2ac77cc2a 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/rte_service.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/rte_service.c
> @@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ rte_service_lcore_stop(uint32_t lcore)
> uint32_t i;
> for (i = 0; i < RTE_SERVICE_NUM_MAX; i++) {
> int32_t enabled =
> - lcore_states[i].service_mask & (UINT64_C(1) << i);
> + lcore_states[lcore].service_mask & (UINT64_C(1) << i);
> int32_t service_running = rte_services[i].runstate !=
> RUNSTATE_STOPPED;
> int32_t only_core = rte_services[i].num_mapped_cores == 1;
> --
> 2.14.1
