> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
> Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 4:00 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.anan...@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce
> <bruce.richard...@intel.com>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/x86: implement x86 specific tsc hz
> 
> First, try to use CPUID Time Stamp Counter and Nominal Core Crystal
> Clock Information Leaf to determine the tsc hz on platforms that
> supports it (does not require priviledge user).

Checkpatch notifies me that "privilege" is spelled wrong (once above, once 
below).

> If the CPUID leaf is not available, then try to determine the tsc hz by
> reading the MSR 0xCE (requires priviledge user).
> 
> Default to the tsc hz estimation if both methods fail.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy <sergio.gonzalez.mon...@intel.com>
> ---
> 
> DEPENDS on Jerin's patch:
> http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/27526/
> 
>  lib/librte_eal/common/arch/x86/rte_cycles.c        | 142 
> +++++++++++++++++++++
>  .../common/include/arch/x86/rte_cycles.h           |   7 +-
>  lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/Makefile               |   1 +
>  3 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 lib/librte_eal/common/arch/x86/rte_cycles.c
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/arch/x86/rte_cycles.c
> b/lib/librte_eal/common/arch/x86/rte_cycles.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..9336947
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/arch/x86/rte_cycles.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
> +/*-
> + *   BSD LICENSE
> + *
> + *   Copyright(c) 2017 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
> + *   All rights reserved.
> + *
> + *   Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> + *   modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
> + *   are met:
> + *
> + *     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
> + *       notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
> + *     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
> + *       notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in
> + *       the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
> + *       distribution.
> + *     * Neither the name of Intel Corporation nor the names of its
> + *       contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived
> + *       from this software without specific prior written permission.
> + *
> + *   THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
> + *   "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
> + *   LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
> + *   A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
> + *   OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
> + *   SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
> + *   LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
> + *   DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
> + *   THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
> + *   (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
> + *   OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
> + */
> +
> +#include <fcntl.h>
> +#include <unistd.h>
> +#include <cpuid.h>
> +#include <rte_cycles.h>
> +
> +static unsigned int
> +rte_cpu_get_model(uint32_t fam_mod_step)
> +{
> +     uint32_t family, model, ext_model;
> +
> +     family = (fam_mod_step >> 8) & 0xf;
> +     model = (fam_mod_step >> 4) & 0xf;
> +
> +     if (family == 6 || family == 15) {
> +             ext_model = (fam_mod_step >> 16) & 0xf;
> +             model += (ext_model << 4);
> +     }
> +
> +     return model;
> +}
> +
> +static int32_t
> +rdmsr(int msr, uint64_t *val)
> +{
> +     int fd;
> +     int ret = 0;

Initialization of ret will always be overwritten by pread() below, so no need 
to initialize.

> +
> +     fd = open("/dev/cpu/0/msr", O_RDONLY);
> +     if (fd < 0)
> +             return fd;
> +
> +     ret = pread(fd, val, sizeof(uint64_t), msr);
> +
> +     close(fd);
> +
> +     return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static uint32_t
> +check_model_wsm_nhm(uint8_t model)
> +{
> +     switch (model) {
> +     /* Westmere */
> +     case 0x25:
> +     case 0x2C:
> +     case 0x2F:
> +     /* Nehalem */
> +     case 0x1E:
> +     case 0x1F:
> +     case 0x1A:
> +     case 0x2E:
> +             return 1;
> +     }

DPDK coding standards say /* fallthrough */ comments required when falling 
through cases.
In this case I feel it would reduce readability, more than it improves it, but 
I recall
some recent gcc/clang prints warnings if no /* fallthrough */ comments exist.. 
opinions?

Same for switch() below.

> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static uint32_t
> +check_model_gdm_dnv(uint8_t model)
> +{
> +     switch (model) {
> +     /* Goldmont */
> +     case 0x5C:
> +     /* Denverton */
> +     case 0x5F:
> +             return 1;
> +     }
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
> +uint64_t
> +rte_rdtsc_arch_hz(void)
> +{
> +     uint64_t tsc_hz = 0;
> +     uint32_t a, b, c, d, maxleaf;
> +     uint8_t mult, model;
> +     int32_t ret;
> +
> +     /*
> +      * Time Stamp Counter and Nominal Core Crystal Clock
> +      * Information Leaf
> +      */
> +     maxleaf = __get_cpuid_max(0, NULL);
> +
> +     if (maxleaf >= 0x15) {
> +             __cpuid(0x15, a, b, c, d);
> +
> +             /* EBX : TSC/Crystal ratio, ECX : Crystal Hz */
> +             if (b && c)
> +                     return c * (b / a);
> +     }
> +
> +     __cpuid(0x1, a, b, c, d);
> +     model = rte_cpu_get_model(a);
> +
> +     if (check_model_wsm_nhm(model))
> +             mult = 133;
> +     else if ((c & bit_AVX) || check_model_gdm_dnv(model))
> +             mult = 100;
> +     else
> +             return 0;
> +
> +     ret = rdmsr(0xCE, &tsc_hz);
> +     if (!(ret < 0))
> +             return ((tsc_hz >> 8) & 0xff) * mult * 1E6;
> +
> +     return 0;


if (!(ret < 0))   feels a little awkward, end of the function could be reworked 
to, which reads a little cleaner to me?

+     if (ret < 0)
+               return 0;
+       return ((tsc_hz >> 8) & 0xff) * mult * 1E6;


> +}
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/x86/rte_cycles.h
> b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/x86/rte_cycles.h
> index e2661e2..0db89dc 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/x86/rte_cycles.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/x86/rte_cycles.h
> @@ -84,11 +84,8 @@ rte_rdtsc(void)
>   *   The number of rdtsc cycles in one second. Return zero if the 
> architecture
>   *   support is not available.
>   */
> -static inline uint64_t
> -rte_rdtsc_arch_hz(void)
> -{
> -     return 0;
> -}
> +uint64_t
> +rte_rdtsc_arch_hz(void);
> 
>  static inline uint64_t
>  rte_rdtsc_precise(void)
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/Makefile 
> b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/Makefile
> index 90bca4d..9d44828 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/Makefile
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/Makefile
> @@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_EXEC_ENV_LINUXAPP) += rte_service.c
>  # from arch dir
>  SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_EXEC_ENV_LINUXAPP) += rte_cpuflags.c
>  SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_X86) += rte_spinlock.c
> +SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_X86) += rte_cycles.c
> 
>  CFLAGS_eal_common_cpuflags.o := $(CPUFLAGS_LIST)
> 
> --
> 2.9.5

With above changes, and optionally /* fallthrough */ comments;

Acked-by: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haa...@intel.com>

Reply via email to