Added new callbacks to notify about socket connection status.
As destroy_device is used for virtqueue processing *pause* as well as
connection close, the user has no distinction between those.

Consider the following scenario:
rte_vhost: received SET_VRING_BASE message,
           calling destroy_device() as usual

user:  end-user asks to remove the device (together with socket file),
       OK, device is not *in use* - that's NOT the behavior we want
       calling rte_vhost_driver_unregister() etc.

Instead of changing new_device/destroy_device callbacks and breaking
the ABI, a set of new functions new_connection/destroy_connection
has been added.

Signed-off-by: Dariusz Stojaczyk <dariuszx.stojac...@intel.com>
---
v3: improved err-handling path and updated commit msg
v2: also updated vhost_lib.rst
 lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost.h |  5 ++++-
 lib/librte_vhost/socket.c    | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost.h b/lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost.h
index 8c974eb..fe5c94c 100644
--- a/lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost.h
+++ b/lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost.h
@@ -107,7 +107,10 @@ struct vhost_device_ops {
         */
        int (*features_changed)(int vid, uint64_t features);
 
-       void *reserved[4]; /**< Reserved for future extension */
+       int (*new_connection)(int vid);
+       void (*destroy_connection)(int vid);
+
+       void *reserved[2]; /**< Reserved for future extension */
 };
 
 /**
diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/socket.c b/lib/librte_vhost/socket.c
index 41aa3f9..7018150 100644
--- a/lib/librte_vhost/socket.c
+++ b/lib/librte_vhost/socket.c
@@ -217,9 +217,7 @@ vhost_user_add_connection(int fd, struct vhost_user_socket 
*vsocket)
 
        vid = vhost_new_device();
        if (vid == -1) {
-               close(fd);
-               free(conn);
-               return;
+               goto err;
        }
 
        size = strnlen(vsocket->path, PATH_MAX);
@@ -230,24 +228,40 @@ vhost_user_add_connection(int fd, struct 
vhost_user_socket *vsocket)
 
        RTE_LOG(INFO, VHOST_CONFIG, "new device, handle is %d\n", vid);
 
+       if (vsocket->notify_ops->new_connection) {
+               ret = vsocket->notify_ops->new_connection(vid);
+               if (ret < 0) {
+                       RTE_LOG(ERR, VHOST_CONFIG,
+                               "failed to add vhost user connection with fd 
%d\n",
+                               fd);
+                       goto err;
+               }
+       }
+
        conn->connfd = fd;
        conn->vsocket = vsocket;
        conn->vid = vid;
        ret = fdset_add(&vhost_user.fdset, fd, vhost_user_read_cb,
                        NULL, conn);
        if (ret < 0) {
-               conn->connfd = -1;
-               free(conn);
-               close(fd);
                RTE_LOG(ERR, VHOST_CONFIG,
                        "failed to add fd %d into vhost server fdset\n",
                        fd);
-               return;
+
+               if (vsocket->notify_ops->destroy_connection)
+                       vsocket->notify_ops->destroy_connection(conn->vid);
+
+               goto err;
        }
 
        pthread_mutex_lock(&vsocket->conn_mutex);
        TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&vsocket->conn_list, conn, next);
        pthread_mutex_unlock(&vsocket->conn_mutex);
+       return;
+
+err:
+       free(conn);
+       close(fd);
 }
 
 /* call back when there is new vhost-user connection from client  */
@@ -277,6 +291,9 @@ vhost_user_read_cb(int connfd, void *dat, int *remove)
                *remove = 1;
                vhost_destroy_device(conn->vid);
 
+               if (vsocket->notify_ops->destroy_connection)
+                       vsocket->notify_ops->destroy_connection(conn->vid);
+
                pthread_mutex_lock(&vsocket->conn_mutex);
                TAILQ_REMOVE(&vsocket->conn_list, conn, next);
                pthread_mutex_unlock(&vsocket->conn_mutex);
-- 
2.7.4

Reply via email to