Hiļ¼Pablo: > -----Original Message----- > From: De Lara Guarch, Pablo > Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2017 5:01 PM > To: Yang, Zhiyong <zhiyong.y...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org > Cc: tho...@monjalon.net > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] increase port_id range > > Hi Zhiyong, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zhiyong Yang > > Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2017 9:42 AM > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > Cc: tho...@monjalon.net > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] increase port_id range > > > > port_id is currently defined as uint8_t, which is limited to the range > > 0 to 255. A larger range is required for vdev scalability. > > > > It is necessary for a redefinition of port_id to extend it from 1 > > bytes to > > 2 bytes. All ethdev APIs and usages related to port_id will be changed > > at the same time. > > > > Below is an API/ABI change notice for DPDK 17.11. > > http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/27475/ > > > > Discussion about port_id is the following thread. > > http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/23208/ > > > > Zhiyong Yang (2): > > ethdev: increase port_id range > > examples: increase port_id range > > > > app/pdump/main.c | 2 +- > > app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 4 +- > > app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 4 +- > > app/test-pmd/testpmd.h | 2 +- > > drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond.h | 40 ++-- > > drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c | 6 +- > > drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_api.c | 54 +++--- > > drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c | 10 +- > > drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_private.h | 36 ++-- > > drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe_ether.c | 4 +- > > drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe_private.h | 4 +- > > drivers/net/ring/rte_eth_ring.c | 2 +- > > examples/bond/main.c | 6 +- > > examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c | 4 +- > > examples/l3fwd-power/main.c | 7 +- > > examples/l3fwd/l3fwd.h | 10 +- > > examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c | 2 +- > > examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c | 2 +- > > examples/link_status_interrupt/main.c | 5 +- > > examples/performance-thread/l3fwd-thread/main.c | 7 +- > > examples/rxtx_callbacks/main.c | 8 +- > > lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c | 231 > > +++++++++++------------ > > lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h | 236 > > ++++++++++++------------ > > lib/librte_ether/rte_tm.c | 62 +++---- > > lib/librte_ether/rte_tm.h | 60 +++--- > > lib/librte_ether/rte_tm_driver.h | 2 +- > > lib/librte_latencystats/rte_latencystats.c | 8 +- > > lib/librte_pdump/rte_pdump.c | 16 +- > > lib/librte_pdump/rte_pdump.h | 4 +- > > lib/librte_port/rte_port_ethdev.c | 6 +- > > lib/librte_port/rte_port_ethdev.h | 6 +- > > 31 files changed, 431 insertions(+), 419 deletions(-) > > > > -- > > 2.13.3 > > You should remove the deprecation notice that was sent for the ABI breakage in > this patchset, and add a note in release notes, documenting the API/ABI > changes > that you have done. >
Thank you, Pablo. I forget to add a note. Deprecation notice will be removed if need v2 patch. It is my first patchset which needs to send deprecation notice firstly. :) Zhiyong > Thanks, > Pablo
