On Tuesday 11 July 2017 02:45 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>
> On 07/11/2017 08:16 AM, Santosh Shukla wrote:
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bus.h
>> b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bus.h
>> index af9f0e13f..7a0cfb165 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bus.h
>> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bus.h
>> @@ -55,6 +55,15 @@ extern "C" {
>> /** Double linked list of buses */
>> TAILQ_HEAD(rte_bus_list, rte_bus);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * IOVA mapping mode.
>> + */
>> +enum rte_iova_mode {
>> + RTE_IOVA_PA = 1,
>> + RTE_IOVA_VA
>> +};
>> +
>> /**
>> * Bus specific scan for devices attached on the bus.
>> * For each bus object, the scan would be responsible for finding devices
>> and
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci.h
>> b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci.h
>> index 4a485674e..c58361132 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci.h
>> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci.h
>> @@ -383,6 +383,17 @@ int
>> rte_pci_match(const struct rte_pci_driver *pci_drv,
>> const struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * Get iommu class of PCI devices on the bus.
>> + * And return their preferred iova mapping mode.
>> + *
>> + * @return
>> + * - enum rte_iova_mode.
>> + */
>> +enum rte_iova_mode
>> +rte_pci_get_iommu_class(void);
>> +
>> /**
>> * Map the PCI device resources in user space virtual memory address
>> *
>
> I would have put this in a separate patch, as not bsd specifics.
>
I'll pull that out in v4, and perhaps squash into [01/11], as both changes
(RTE_PCI_DRV_ and this one)
are on same rte_pci.h file. Is it Ok with you? or you prefer separate patch for
both
(RTE_PCI_DRV_ and this one)?
> Maxime
