On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 01:19:06AM +0000, Wu, Jingjing wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:y...@fridaylinux.org]
> > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] testpmd: give more hint on invalid RETA size
> >
> > Print the valid RTE size range so that user knows what goes wrong.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu <y...@fridaylinux.org>
> > ---
> > app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 8 +++++---
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> > index c8faef9..d32a1df 100644
> > --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> > +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> > @@ -2140,12 +2140,14 @@ cmd_showport_reta_parsed(void *parsed_result,
> > struct cmd_showport_reta *res = parsed_result;
> > struct rte_eth_rss_reta_entry64 reta_conf[8];
> > struct rte_eth_dev_info dev_info;
> > + uint16_t max_reta_size;
> >
> > memset(&dev_info, 0, sizeof(dev_info));
> > rte_eth_dev_info_get(res->port_id, &dev_info);
> > - if (dev_info.reta_size == 0 || res->size > dev_info.reta_size ||
> > - res->size > ETH_RSS_RETA_SIZE_512) {
> > - printf("Invalid redirection table size: %u\n", res->size);
> > + max_reta_size = RTE_MIN(dev_info.reta_size, ETH_RSS_RETA_SIZE_512);
> > + if (res->size == 0 || res->size > max_reta_size) {
> > + printf("Invalid redirection table size: %u (1-%u)\n",
> > + res->size, max_reta_size);
> > return;
> > }
> >
> Why not merge this with previous one?
Because they are two differnt things, even though each of them is really tiny.
--yliu
