-----Original Message-----
> Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 20:44:17 +0100
> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>
> To: Jerin Jacob <jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com>
> CC: dev@dpdk.org, tho...@monjalon.net
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] eal/pci: introduce a PCI driver flag
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
> Thunderbird/52.1.1
>
> On 6/8/2017 6:15 PM, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> >> Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 15:40:33 +0100
> >> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>
> >> To: Jerin Jacob <jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com>, dev@dpdk.org
> >> CC: tho...@monjalon.net
> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] eal/pci: introduce a PCI driver flag
> >> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
> >> Thunderbird/52.1.1
> >>
> >> On 6/8/2017 12:44 PM, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> >>> Some ethdev devices like nicvf thunderx PMD need special treatment for
> >>> Secondary queue set(SQS) PCIe VF devices, where, it expects to not unmap
> >>> or free the memory without registering the ethdev subsystem.
> >>>
> >>> Introducing a new RTE_PCI_DRV_KEEP_MAPPED_RES
> >>> PCI driver flag to request PCI subsystem to not unmap the mapped PCI
> >>> resources(PCI BAR address) if unsupported device detected.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob <jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com>
> >>
> >> <...>
> >>
> >>> @@ -235,6 +240,7 @@ rte_pci_probe_one_driver(struct rte_pci_driver *dr,
> >>> static int
> >>> rte_pci_detach_dev(struct rte_pci_device *dev)
> >>> {
> >>> + int ret = 0;
> >>> struct rte_pci_addr *loc;
> >>> struct rte_pci_driver *dr;
> >>>
> >>> @@ -251,13 +257,18 @@ rte_pci_detach_dev(struct rte_pci_device *dev)
> >>> RTE_LOG(DEBUG, EAL, " remove driver: %x:%x %s\n", dev->id.vendor_id,
> >>> dev->id.device_id, dr->driver.name);
> >>>
> >>> - if (dr->remove && (dr->remove(dev) < 0))
> >>> - return -1; /* negative value is an error */
> >>> + if (dr->remove) {
> >>> + ret = dr->remove(dev);
> >>> + if (ret < 0)
> >>> + return -1; /* negative value is an error */
> >>> + }
> >>>
> >>> /* clear driver structure */
> >>> dev->driver = NULL;
> >>>
> >>> - if (dr->drv_flags & RTE_PCI_DRV_NEED_MAPPING)
> >>> + if ((dr->drv_flags & RTE_PCI_DRV_NEED_MAPPING) &&
> >>> + /* Don't unmap if dev is unsupported and it needs mapped resources */
> >>> + !(ret > 0 && (dr->drv_flags & RTE_PCI_DRV_KEEP_MAPPED_RES)))
> >>
> >> Why it is required to keep mapping during detach?
> >
> > To keep symmetrical with other(on probe) unmap change. This will
> > activated only when PMD returns the positive number on remove() so PMD
> > has control over it. The existing use case, We cannot just detach a single
> > VF(one SQS VF is _not_ one ethdev port i.e one ethdev port consists of
> > multiple VFs) so we need control on when to unmap those BARs.
>
> For generic eal, there is an explicit request to detach the device, I am
> not sure about returning success but not releasing the resources based
> on PMD flag. How this will work with hotplug?
Again it is in the control of PMD. If PMD remove() returns 0 or <0 or
!RTE_PCI_DRV_KEEP_MAPPED_RES flag it will release the memory. If PMD is
keeping the resources it can free on primary(!SQS VF) VF detach.
>
>
> And specific to your case, -thanks for clarification, since no eth_dev
> created for SQS VF, rte_eth_dev_pci_generic_remove() won't be useful but
> assuming you have implemented your remove(), can it be possible to
> detect SQS VF and act accordingly, or just return error perhaps if you
> cannot detach that VF?
nicvf PMD is not advertising RTE_ETH_DEV_DETACHABLE capable and it is in
integrated internal bus so PCI hot-plug may not be a use case for this
PMD.
if you still think, RTE_PCI_DRV_KEEP_MAPPED_RES check needs to removed from
rte_pci_detach_dev(), I can do that send a new version.
>
> >
> >>
> >>> /* unmap resources for devices that use igb_uio */
> >>> rte_pci_unmap_device(dev);
> >>>
> >>
> >> <...>
> >>
>
