On 5/18/2017 3:00 PM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybche...@solarflare.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Moreton <amore...@solarflare.com>
<...>
> Linux VFIO = Y
> diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc.h b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc.h
> index 772a713..007ed24 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc.h
> @@ -225,7 +225,18 @@ struct sfc_adapter {
> uint8_t rss_key[SFC_RSS_KEY_SIZE];
> #endif
>
> + /*
> + * Shared memory copy of the Rx datapath name to be used by
> + * the secondary process to find Rx datapath to be used.
> + */
> + char *dp_rx_name;
Why not use sa->dp_rx->dp.name to find the dp_rx? That variable should
be shared between processes already?
<...>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_rx.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_rx.c
> index 1484bab..60812cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_rx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_rx.c
> @@ -699,7 +699,7 @@ struct sfc_dp_rx sfc_ef10_rx = {
> .type = SFC_DP_RX,
> .hw_fw_caps = SFC_DP_HW_FW_CAP_EF10,
> },
> - .features = 0,
> + .features = SFC_DP_RX_FEAT_MULTI_PROCESS,
Why this flag is needed, I mean why multi process support is not always
enabled by default?
<...>
