Adrien, Here is another crack at the comments for rte_flow_validate. Does this capture what you were explaining to me?
I'm still not crazy about multiple meanings for EEXIST or ENOMEM since it makes them unusable by apps, but at least the comments try to explain it. In 17.08 what about having PMDs indicate if they support flow collision and resouce checking, or drop those return codes all together? cheers, john John Daley (1): ethdev: fix flow validate comments lib/librte_ether/rte_flow.h | 17 ++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) -- 2.12.0
