2017-03-15 04:10, O'Driscoll, Tim: > I've included a couple of specific comments inline below, and a general > comment here. > > We have somebody proposing to add a new driver to DPDK. It's standalone and > doesn't affect any of the core libraries. They're willing to maintain the > driver and have included a patch to update the maintainers file. They've also > included the relevant documentation changes. I haven't seen any negative > comment on the patches themselves except for a request from John McNamara for > an update to the Release Notes that was addressed in a later version. I think > we should be welcoming this into DPDK rather than questioning/rejecting it. > > I'd suggest that this is a good topic for the next Tech Board meeting.
I agree Tim. CC'ing techboard to add this item to the agenda of the next meeting.
