On 13/3/2017 11:01 AM, Van Haaren, Harry wrote:
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Hunt, David
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 09/18] lib: add symbol versioning to
distributor
On 10/3/2017 4:22 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 09:10:24AM +0000, David Hunt wrote:
Also bumped up the ABI version number in the Makefile
Signed-off-by: David Hunt <david.h...@intel.com>
---
lib/librte_distributor/Makefile | 2 +-
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c | 57 +++++++++++---
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor_v1705.h | 89
++++++++++++++++++++++
A file named rte_distributor_v1705.h was added in patch 4, then deleted
in patch 7, and now added again here. Seems a lot of churn.
/Bruce
The first introduction of this file is what will become the public
header. For successful compilation,
this cannot be called rte_distributor.h until the symbol versioning
patch, at which stage I will
rename the file, and introduce the symbol versioned header at the same
time. In the next patch
I'll rename this version of the files as rte_distributor_public.h to
make this clearer.
Suggestion to use rte_distributor_next.h instead of public?
Public doesn't indicate if its old or new, while next would make that clearer
IMO :)
Good call, will use "_next". Its clearer.
Thanks,
Dave.
