On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 09:38:11AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Fri,  3 Mar 2017 16:40:28 +0100
Gaetan Rivet <gaetan.ri...@6wind.com> wrote:

+
+static struct rte_eth_dev *
+pci_addr_to_eth_dev(struct rte_pci_addr *addr)
+{
+       uint8_t pid;
+
+       if (addr == NULL)
+               return NULL;
+       for (pid = 0; pid < RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS; pid++) {
+               struct rte_pci_addr *addr2;
+               struct rte_eth_dev *edev;
+
+               edev = &rte_eth_devices[pid];
+               if (edev->device == NULL ||
+                   edev->device->devargs == NULL)
+                       continue;
+               addr2 = &edev->device->devargs->pci.addr;
+               if (rte_eal_compare_pci_addr(addr, addr2) == 0)
+                       return edev;
+       }
+       return NULL;
+}
+
+static int
+pci_scan_one(struct sub_device *sdev)
+{
+       struct rte_devargs *da;
+       char dirname[PATH_MAX];
+
+       da = &sdev->devargs;
+       snprintf(dirname, sizeof(dirname),
+               "%s/" PCI_PRI_FMT,
+               pci_get_sysfs_path(),
+               da->pci.addr.domain,
+               da->pci.addr.bus,
+               da->pci.addr.devid,
+               da->pci.addr.function);
+       errno = 0;
+       if (rte_eal_pci_parse_sysfs_entry(&sdev->pci_device,
+               dirname, &da->pci.addr) < 0) {
+               if (errno == ENOENT) {
+                       DEBUG("Could not scan requested device " PCI_PRI_FMT,
+                               da->pci.addr.domain,
+                               da->pci.addr.bus,
+                               da->pci.addr.devid,
+                               da->pci.addr.function);
+               } else {
+                       ERROR("Error while scanning sysfs entry %s",
+                                       dirname);
+                       return -1;
+               }
+       } else {
+               sdev->state = DEV_SCANNED;
+       }
+       return 0;
+}

This needs to be generic and in EAL.
A bigger problem is that it PCI specific and therefore won't work in 
environments
where devices are attached to different busses (SOC and Hyper-V).

Please rework to play well with bus model.

Yes I agree, I planned to do so in any case for a V2.

I saw a few commits from Jan Blunck about a vdev bus[0].
Do you have other series regarding busses in mind that I should rebase upon for a better support?

[0]: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-March/059423.html

--
Gaëtan Rivet
6WIND

Reply via email to