> -----Original Message----- > From: Ferruh Yigit [mailto:ferruh.yi...@intel.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2017 4:15 AM > To: John Daley (johndale) <johnd...@cisco.com> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] enic flow director fixes > > On 2/9/2017 12:40 AM, John Daley wrote: > > This should replace > > http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/20147/ which was an > > intermediate patch in a small patchset and had a compile error. Also, > > please reject the 2nd patch in the patchset > > http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/20148/ which is incomplete. I > will change the state of these patches in patchworks. > > thank you, john > > Hi John, > > I dropped the previous two and will get this one. And this looks like the > squashed version of the previous two with some updates in ipv6 shift > number. > > Although next-net can re-write the git history, this is mainly to provide > ability > to rebasing on master tree. Not for amending patches on fly, that is > confusing. > > Please next time do not rely on git history re-writing while sending patches.
Oops I was stupidly looking at master and assumed the patches were rejected because of the compile error. I obviously should have been looking at next-net. Thanks, John > > Thanks, > ferruh > > > > > John Daley (1): > > net/enic: fix hardcoding of some flow director masks > > > > drivers/net/enic/enic_clsf.c | 14 +++++++------- > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > >
