> As 1.x is for linux/freebsd, but 2.0 is for solaris, 2.0 doesn't > leverage the messages from 1.x. For example, 0x0a has different > meaning in 1.x and 2.0. So better letting it be. >
Ok, thanks for your reply.
> As 1.x is for linux/freebsd, but 2.0 is for solaris, 2.0 doesn't > leverage the messages from 1.x. For example, 0x0a has different > meaning in 1.x and 2.0. So better letting it be. >
Ok, thanks for your reply.