The function rte_cryptodev_devices_get has several issues. I was just going to
fix it, but think it need to be explained.
 
One potentially serious one (reported by coverity) is:

*** CID 141067:    (BAD_COMPARE)
/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c: 503 in rte_cryptodev_devices_get()
497                                     && (*devs + i)->attached ==
498                                                     RTE_CRYPTODEV_ATTACHED) 
{
499     
500                             dev = (*devs + i)->device;
501     
502                             if (dev)
>>>     CID 141067:    (BAD_COMPARE)
>>>     Truncating the result of "strncmp" to "unsigned char" may cause it to 
>>> be misinterpreted as 0. Note that "strncmp" may return an integer besides 
>>> -1, 0, or 1.  
503                                     cmp = strncmp(dev->driver->name,
504                                                     dev_name,
505                                                     strlen(dev_name));
506                             else
507                                     cmp = strncmp((*devs + i)->data->name,
508                                                     dev_name,
/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c: 507 in rte_cryptodev_devices_get()
501     
502                             if (dev)
503                                     cmp = strncmp(dev->driver->name,
504                                                     dev_name,
505                                                     strlen(dev_name));
506                             else
>>>     CID 141067:    (BAD_COMPARE)
>>>     Truncating the result of "strncmp" to "unsigned char" may cause it to 
>>> be misinterpreted as 0. Note that "strncmp" may return an integer besides 
>>> -1, 0, or 1.  
507                                     cmp = strncmp((*devs + i)->data->name,
508                                                     dev_name,
509                                                     strlen(dev_name));
510     
511                             if (cmp == 0)
512                                     devices[count++] = (*devs + 
i)->data->dev_id;


But also:

1. Incorrect function signature:
    * function returns int but never a negative value. should be unsigned.
    * devices argument is not modified should be const.

2. Original ABI seems short sighted with limit of 256 cryptodevs
    * this seems like 8 bit mindset,  should really use unsigned int instead
      of uint8_t for number of devices.

3. Wacky indention of the if statement.

4. Make variables local to the block they are used (cmp, dev)

5. Use array instead of pointer:
     ie. instead of *devs + i use devs[i]


The overall code in question is:


int
rte_cryptodev_devices_get(const char *dev_name, uint8_t *devices,
        uint8_t nb_devices)
{
        uint8_t i, cmp, count = 0;
        struct rte_cryptodev **devs = &rte_cryptodev_globals->devs;
        struct rte_device *dev;

        for (i = 0; i < rte_cryptodev_globals->max_devs && count < nb_devices;
                        i++) {

                if ((*devs + i)
                                && (*devs + i)->attached ==
                                                RTE_CRYPTODEV_ATTACHED) {

                        dev = (*devs + i)->device;

                        if (dev)
                                cmp = strncmp(dev->driver->name,
                                                dev_name,
                                                strlen(dev_name));
                        else
                                cmp = strncmp((*devs + i)->data->name,
                                                dev_name,
                                                strlen(dev_name));

                        if (cmp == 0)
                                devices[count++] = (*devs + i)->data->dev_id;
                }
        }

        return count;
}

Please fix it.


Reply via email to