> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Remy Horton
> Sent: Monday, January 16, 2017 4:19 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Pattan, Reshma <reshma.pat...@intel.com>; Thomas Monjalon 
> <thomas.monja...@6wind.com>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/6] app/proc_info: add metrics displaying
> 
> From: Reshma Pattan <reshma.pat...@intel.com>
> 
> Modify the dpdk-procinfo process to display the newly added metrics.
> Added new command line option "--metrics" to display metrics.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Reshma Pattan <reshma.pat...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Remy Horton <remy.hor...@intel.com>

Note that current git HEAD has a bug in secondary process - this has already
been raised and fixed in patches on the ML. In testing, I manually fixed the
secondary proc issue, after which testing here worked successfully.

Comments inline.

> ---
>  app/proc_info/main.c | 73 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 73 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/app/proc_info/main.c b/app/proc_info/main.c
> index 2c56d10..e5d626e 100644
> --- a/app/proc_info/main.c
> +++ b/app/proc_info/main.c
> @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@
>  #include <rte_atomic.h>
>  #include <rte_branch_prediction.h>
>  #include <rte_string_fns.h>
> +#include <rte_metrics.h>
> 
>  /* Maximum long option length for option parsing. */
>  #define MAX_LONG_OPT_SZ 64
> @@ -68,6 +69,8 @@ static uint32_t enabled_port_mask;
>  static uint32_t enable_stats;
>  /**< Enable xstats. */
>  static uint32_t enable_xstats;
> +/**< Enable metrics. */
> +static uint32_t enable_metrics;
>  /**< Enable stats reset. */
>  static uint32_t reset_stats;
>  /**< Enable xstats reset. */
> @@ -85,6 +88,8 @@ proc_info_usage(const char *prgname)
>               "  --stats: to display port statistics, enabled by default\n"
>               "  --xstats: to display extended port statistics, disabled by "
>                       "default\n"
> +             "  --metrics: to display derived metrics of the ports, disabled 
> by "
> +                     "default\n"
>               "  --stats-reset: to reset port statistics\n"
>               "  --xstats-reset: to reset port extended statistics\n",

I presume there is no need for a --metrics-reset as the values are reset when 
printed, correct?

>               prgname);
> @@ -127,6 +132,7 @@ proc_info_parse_args(int argc, char **argv)
>               {"stats", 0, NULL, 0},
>               {"stats-reset", 0, NULL, 0},
>               {"xstats", 0, NULL, 0},
> +             {"metrics", 0, NULL, 0},
>               {"xstats-reset", 0, NULL, 0},
>               {NULL, 0, 0, 0}
>       };
> @@ -159,6 +165,10 @@ proc_info_parse_args(int argc, char **argv)
>                       else if (!strncmp(long_option[option_index].name, 
> "xstats",
>                                       MAX_LONG_OPT_SZ))
>                               enable_xstats = 1;
> +                     else if (!strncmp(long_option[option_index].name,
> +                                     "metrics",
> +                                     MAX_LONG_OPT_SZ))
> +                             enable_metrics = 1;
>                       /* Reset stats */
>                       if (!strncmp(long_option[option_index].name, 
> "stats-reset",
>                                       MAX_LONG_OPT_SZ))
> @@ -301,6 +311,63 @@ nic_xstats_clear(uint8_t port_id)
>       printf("\n  NIC extended statistics for port %d cleared\n", port_id);
>  }
> 
> +static void
> +metrics_display(int port_id)
> +{
> +     struct rte_metric_value *metrics;
> +     struct rte_metric_name *names;
> +     int len, ret;
> +     static const char *nic_stats_border = "########################";
> +
> +     memset(&metrics, 0, sizeof(struct rte_metric_value));
> +     len = rte_metrics_get_names(NULL, 0);
> +     if (len < 0) {
> +             printf("Cannot get metrics count\n");
> +             return;
> +     }
> +
> +     metrics = malloc(sizeof(struct rte_metric_value) * len);
> +     if (metrics == NULL) {
> +             printf("Cannot allocate memory for metrics\n");
> +             return;
> +     }

Is malloc() favoured over rte_malloc() for a reason?

> +
> +     names =  malloc(sizeof(struct rte_metric_name) * len);
> +     if (names == NULL) {
> +             printf("Cannot allocate memory for metrcis names\n");
> +             free(metrics);
> +             return;
> +     }
> +
> +     if (len != rte_metrics_get_names(names, len)) {
> +             printf("Cannot get metrics names\n");
> +             free(metrics);
> +             free(names);
> +             return;
> +     }
> +
> +     if (port_id == RTE_METRICS_GLOBAL)
> +             printf("###### Non port specific metrics  #########\n");
> +     else
> +             printf("###### metrics for port %-2d #########\n", port_id);
> +     printf("%s############################\n", nic_stats_border);
> +     ret = rte_metrics_get_values(port_id, metrics, len);
> +     if (ret < 0 || ret > len) {
> +             printf("Cannot get metrics values\n");
> +             free(metrics);
> +             free(names);
> +             return;
> +     }
> +
> +     int i;
> +     for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
> +             printf("%s: %"PRIu64"\n", names[i].name, metrics[i].value);
> +
> +     printf("%s############################\n", nic_stats_border);
> +     free(metrics);
> +     free(names);
> +}
> +
>  int
>  main(int argc, char **argv)
>  {
> @@ -360,8 +427,14 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
>                               nic_stats_clear(i);
>                       else if (reset_xstats)
>                               nic_xstats_clear(i);
> +                     else if (enable_metrics)
> +                             metrics_display(i);
>               }
>       }
> 
> +     /* print port independent stats */
> +     if (enable_metrics)
> +             metrics_display(RTE_METRICS_GLOBAL);
> +
>       return 0;
>  }
> --
> 2.5.5

Reply via email to