On 17/01/2017 04:29, Jerin Jacob wrote: [..]
It is a value added feature for DPDK. But what is the plan for incorporating the mbuf change? I have 8 month old mbuf change for ARM for natural alignment. If we are accepting any mbuf change then we need to include outstanding mbuf changes to avoid future ABI breakage.http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/12878/
I know there's some discussion going on in the background regarding this. I've yet to hear a definite answer myself..
..Remy
