On 1/7/2017 6:17 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> There are multiple buses and device types now. Therefore it no longer
> makes sense that PCI driver information is part of the Ethernet driver
> structure.
>
> This patch removes pci_driver from eth_driver and introduces a
> new combined structure for use in all existing PMD's. The rationale
> is that although all existing PCI drivers are Ethernet drivers,
> it make sense that future projects may want to support PCI devices
> that are not Ethernet.
>
> It also removes the requirement that driver is first element in
> PCI driver structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <sthem...@microsoft.com>
> ---
<...>
> /**
> + * @internal
> + * The structure associated with a PMD PCI Ethernet driver.
> + */
> +struct rte_pci_eth_driver {
> + struct rte_pci_driver pci_drv; /**< Underlying PCI driver. */
> + struct eth_driver eth_drv; /**< Ethernet driver. */
> +};
So do we need to add rte_vdev_eth_driver struct for virtual drivers, or
need to add rte_pci_cryptodev_driver struct for pci crypto devices?
Can this be done in a more generic way? After Shreyansh's patches, there
will be rte_device, rte_driver abstractions, can they be useful?
<...>
