On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 03:45:35PM +0000, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 12/13/2016 1:08 AM, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <michal.miros...@atendesoftware.pl>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c | 5 +++--
> > lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_interrupts.c | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > index 67778ba..39fbcfe 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > @@ -1692,8 +1692,9 @@ i40e_dev_start(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> > !RTE_ETH_DEV_SRIOV(dev).active) &&
> > dev->data->dev_conf.intr_conf.rxq != 0) {
> > intr_vector = dev->data->nb_rx_queues;
> > - if (rte_intr_efd_enable(intr_handle, intr_vector))
> > - return -1;
> > + ret = rte_intr_efd_enable(intr_handle, intr_vector);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
>
> What is the benefit of returning -errno instead of -1?
Information. Besides, all other error returns from i40e_dev_start return
negated error code (-1 happens to be -EPERM, which further confuses
the poor developer who's diagnosing the failure).
Best Regards,
Michał Mirosław
