Hi Ferruh,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ferruh Yigit
> Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2016 1:25 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Wu, Jingjing <jingjing...@intel.com>; Zhang, Helin
> <helin.zh...@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>; Lu, Wenzhuo
> <wenzhuo...@intel.com>; Chen, Jing D <jing.d.c...@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 29/29] net/i40e: set/clear VF stats from
> PF
>
> On 12/16/2016 7:02 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > From: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>
> >
> > This patch add support to get/clear VF statistics from PF side.
> > Two APIs are added:
> > rte_pmd_i40e_get_vf_stats.
> > rte_pmd_i40e_reset_vf_stats.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>
> > ---
>
> <...>
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/rte_pmd_i40e_version.map
> > b/drivers/net/i40e/rte_pmd_i40e_version.map
> > index 8ac1bc8..7a5d211 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/rte_pmd_i40e_version.map
> > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/rte_pmd_i40e_version.map
> > @@ -6,7 +6,9 @@ DPDK_2.0 {
> > DPDK_17.02 {
> > global:
> >
> > + rte_pmd_i40e_get_vf_stats;
> > rte_pmd_i40e_ping_vfs;
> > + rte_pmd_i40e_reset_vf_stats;
> > rte_pmd_i40e_set_tx_loopback;
> > rte_pmd_i40e_set_vf_broadcast;
> > rte_pmd_i40e_set_vf_mac_addr;
>
> Hi Wenzhuo, Mark,
>
> I think this is the list of all APIs added with this patchset.
>
> Just a question, what do you think following a logic in API naming as:
> <name_space>_<object>_<action> ?
>
> So API names become:
> rte_pmd_i40e_tx_loopback_set;
> rte_pmd_i40e_vf_broadcast_set;
> rte_pmd_i40e_vf_mac_addr_set;
> rte_pmd_i40e_vfs_ping;
> rte_pmd_i40e_vf_stats_get;
> rte_pmd_i40e_vf_stats_reset;
>
>
> After above rename, rte_pmd_i40e_tx_loopback_set() is not giving a hint
> that this is something related to the PF controlling VF, perhaps we can
> rename the API ?
>
> Also rte_pmd_i40e_vfs_ping() can become rte_pmd_i40e_vf_ping_all() to
> be more consistent about _vf_ usage.
>
> Overall, they can be something like:
> rte_pmd_i40e_vf_broadcast_set;
> rte_pmd_i40e_vf_mac_addr_set;
> rte_pmd_i40e_vf_ping_all;
> rte_pmd_i40e_vf_stats_get;
> rte_pmd_i40e_vf_stats_reset;
> rte_pmd_i40e_vf_tx_loopback_set;
>
> What do you think?
>
I think the naming should be consistent with what has already been implemented
for the ixgbe PMD.
rte_pmd_ixgbe_set_all_queues_drop_en;
rte_pmd_ixgbe_set_tx_loopback;
rte_pmd_ixgbe_set_vf_mac_addr;
rte_pmd_ixgbe_set_vf_mac_anti_spoof;
rte_pmd_ixgbe_set_vf_split_drop_en;
rte_pmd_ixgbe_set_vf_vlan_anti_spoof;
rte_pmd_ixgbe_set_vf_vlan_insert;
rte_pmd_ixgbe_set_vf_vlan_stripq;
rte_pmd_ixgbe_set_vf_rate_limit;
rte_pmd_ixgbe_set_vf_rx;
rte_pmd_ixgbe_set_vf_rxmode;
rte_pmd_ixgbe_set_vf_tx;
rte_pmd_ixgbe_set_vf_vlan_filter;
Regards,
Bernard.
