On 12/9/2016 11:27 AM, Bernard Iremonger wrote:
> Use the the following ixgbe public functions:
>
> rte_pmd_ixgbe_set_vf_rate_limit
> rte_pmd_ixgbe_set_vf_rx
> rte_pmd_ixgbe_set_vf_rxmode
> rte_pmd_ixgbe_set_vf_tx
> rte_pmd_ixgbe_set_vf_vlan_filter
>
> Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremon...@intel.com>
<...>
> @@ -2388,23 +2391,11 @@ int
> set_vf_rate_limit(portid_t port_id, uint16_t vf, uint16_t rate, uint64_t
> q_msk)
> {
> int diag;
> - struct rte_eth_link link;
> -
> - if (q_msk == 0)
> - return 0;
>
> - if (port_id_is_invalid(port_id, ENABLED_WARN))
> - return 1;
> - rte_eth_link_get_nowait(port_id, &link);
> - if (rate > link.link_speed) {
> - printf("Invalid rate value:%u bigger than link speed: %u\n",
> - rate, link.link_speed);
> - return 1;
> - }
Why these changes required? Isn't only change is location and naming of
the ...set_vf_rate_limit() ?
> - diag = rte_eth_set_vf_rate_limit(port_id, vf, rate, q_msk);
> + diag = rte_pmd_ixgbe_set_vf_rate_limit(port_id, vf, rate, q_msk);
> if (diag == 0)
> return diag;
> - printf("rte_eth_set_vf_rate_limit for port_id=%d failed diag=%d\n",
> + printf("rte_pmd_ixgbe_set_vf_rate_limit for port_id=%d failed
> diag=%d\n",
> port_id, diag);
> return diag;
> }
>
