On 2016/03/22 0:40, Loftus, Ciara wrote: >> + >> +static void >> +eth_dev_info(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, >> + struct rte_eth_dev_info *dev_info) >> +{ >> + dev_info->driver_name = drivername; >> + dev_info->max_mac_addrs = 1; >> + dev_info->max_rx_pktlen = (uint32_t)-1; >> + dev_info->max_rx_queues = dev->data->nb_rx_queues; >> + dev_info->max_tx_queues = dev->data->nb_tx_queues; > I'm not entirely familiar with eth driver code so please correct me if I am > wrong. > > I'm wondering if assigning the max queue values to dev->data->nb_*x_queues is > correct. > A user could change the value of nb_*x_queues with a call to > rte_eth_dev_configure(n_queues) which in turn calls > rte_eth_dev_*x_queue_config(n_queues) which will set dev->data->nb_*x_queues > to the value of n_queues which can be arbitrary and decided by the user. If > this is the case, dev->data->nb_*x_queues will no longer reflect the max, > rather the value the user chose in the call to rte_eth_dev_configure. And the > max could potentially change with multiple calls to configure. Is this > intended behaviour?
Hi Ciara, Thanks for reviewing it. Here is a part of rte_eth_dev_configure(). int rte_eth_dev_configure(uint8_t port_id, uint16_t nb_rx_q, uint16_t nb_tx_q, const struct rte_eth_conf *dev_conf) { <snip> /* * Check that the numbers of RX and TX queues are not greater * than the maximum number of RX and TX queues supported by the * configured device. */ (*dev->dev_ops->dev_infos_get)(dev, &dev_info); if (nb_rx_q == 0 && nb_tx_q == 0) { <snip> return -EINVAL; } if (nb_rx_q > dev_info.max_rx_queues) { <snip> return -EINVAL; } if (nb_tx_q > dev_info.max_tx_queues) { <snip> return -EINVAL; } <snip> /* * Setup new number of RX/TX queues and reconfigure device. */ diag = rte_eth_dev_rx_queue_config(dev, nb_rx_q); <snip> diag = rte_eth_dev_tx_queue_config(dev, nb_tx_q); <snip> } Anyway, rte_eth_dev_tx/rx_queue_config() will be called only after checking the current maximum number of queues. So the user cannot set the number of queues greater than current maximum number. Regards, Tetsuya