> -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zhe Tao > Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 7:08 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/dpdk_qat: Fix RX queue start > number to the one just received the packets > > Every time we started to receive the packets, the start queue number should > be the one that just received the packets, should not start from zero! > > Signed-off-by: Zhe Tao <zhe.tao at intel.com> > --- > examples/dpdk_qat/main.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/examples/dpdk_qat/main.c b/examples/dpdk_qat/main.c index > dc68989..b818e4e 100644 > --- a/examples/dpdk_qat/main.c > +++ b/examples/dpdk_qat/main.c > @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ nic_rx_get_packet(struct lcore_conf *qconf) > uint32_t i; > > qconf->rx_mbuf_pos = 0; > - for (i = 0; i < qconf->n_rx_queue; i++) { > + for (i = qconf->rx_curr_queue; i < qconf->n_rx_queue; i++) { > qconf->rx_mbuf.len = rte_eth_rx_burst( > qconf->rx_queue_list[qconf- > >rx_curr_queue].port_id, > qconf->rx_queue_list[qconf- > >rx_curr_queue].queue_id,
I don't think we need to change the start queue number from 0 to rx_curr_queue. If changes to start from rx_curr_queue, the queue whose id is less than rx_curr_queue won't be scanned until this function is called next time. > -- > 1.9.3
