On 07/12/15 01:32, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-09-29 19:07, Zhe Tao:
>> Every time we started to receive the packets, the start queue number
>> should be the one that just received the packets, should not start from zero!
>>
> [...]
>> - for (i = 0; i < qconf->n_rx_queue; i++) {
>> + for (i = qconf->rx_curr_queue; i < qconf->n_rx_queue; i++) {
>
> Anyone to confirm?
>I'll have a look at this this morning Thomas.
