Hi Jerin, On 06/03/2016 09:02 AM, Jerin Jacob wrote: > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 11:16:16PM +0200, Olivier MATZ wrote: > Hi Olivier, > >> This is probably more a measure of the pure CPU cost of the mempool >> function, without considering the memory cache aspect. So, of course, >> a real use-case test should be done to confirm or not that it increases >> the performance. I'll manage to do a test and let you know the result. > > OK > > IMO, put rte_memcpy makes sense(this patch) as their no behavior change. > However, if get rte_memcpy with behavioral changes makes sense some platform > then we can enable it on conditional basics(I am OK with that) > >> >> By the way, not all drivers are allocating or freeing the mbufs by >> bulk, so this modification would only affect these ones. What driver >> are you using for your test? > > I have tested with ThunderX nicvf pmd(uses the bulk mode). > Recently sent out driver in ml for review
Just to let you know I do not forget this. I still need to find some time to do a performance test. Regards, Olivier
